Lolium rigidum - Image of an specimen

Default transition mode:

to another photo in order of publishing to another photo of the taxon to another photo in group to another photo of author to another photo in geographic point

Часть соцветия с охотящимся пауком. Крым, Севастополь, окр. с. Оборонное. 31 мая 2010 г.

Pavel Yevseyenkov CC BY-NC 2017; taxon identified by Vladislav Grigorenko

Shooting place: Балаклавские высоты (view at maps of Google, OpenStreetMap, Yandex)

The marker on the map does not indicate the exact coordinates of the plant or lichen.

The marker does only indicate the conditional center of the terrain ("geographic point") where the photo was taken.

Open map

Code of link to photo

Create:	HTML or BBCode with preview or HTML or BBCode with image compressed to a given width
Code for linking on the web:	In the line above, select the type of link code you would like to receive. HTML is suitable for insertion into the body of pages, BBCode is for forums that support this markup language.
This is how it will look:	Lolium rigidum on the site «Plantarium»

Евсеенков П. 2017. Изображение Lolium rigidum Gaudin // Плантариум. Растения и лишайники России и сопредельных стран: открытый онлайн атлас и определитель растений. [Электронный ресурс] URL: https://www.plantarium.ru/page/image/id/57924.html (дата обращения: 08.11.2024).

Yevseyenkov P.E. 2017. Image of Lolium rigidum Gaudin // Plantarium. Plants and lichens of Russia and neighboring countries: open online galleries and plant identification guide. URL: https://www.plantarium.ru/lang/en/page/image/id/57924.html (accessed on 8 Nov 2024).

Landscapes and habitats Plants and lichens Taxa with photos View discussion

Views: 767
Discussion

Pavel Yevseyenkov	1 Может хоть паучок определится :)
Nikolay Degtyaryov	2 Сложно сказать с этого ракурса. А тенету не помните?
Close

All photos of taxon

Code of link to photo

Text to cite the page

Views: 767
Discussion

All photos of taxon

Code of link to photo

Text to cite the page

Views: 767Discussion

Views: 767
Discussion