genus Juniperus - Image of an specimen

Default transition mode:

to another photo in order of publishing to another photo of the taxon to another photo in group to another photo of author to another photo in geographic point

Ветвь. Краснодар, сад КГАУ. 14 сентября 2007 г.

Shooting place: Краснодарский ботанический сад (view at maps of Google, OpenStreetMap, Yandex)

The marker on the map does not indicate the exact coordinates of the plant or lichen.

The marker does only indicate the conditional center of the terrain ("geographic point") where the photo was taken.

Open map

Code of link to photo

Create:	HTML or BBCode with preview or HTML or BBCode with image compressed to a given width
Code for linking on the web:	In the line above, select the type of link code you would like to receive. HTML is suitable for insertion into the body of pages, BBCode is for forums that support this markup language.
This is how it will look:	genus Juniperus on the site «Plantarium»

Иванов В.Д. 2009. Изображение Juniperus // Плантариум. Растения и лишайники России и сопредельных стран: открытый онлайн атлас и определитель растений. [Электронный ресурс] URL: https://www.plantarium.ru/page/image/id/15019.html (дата обращения: 02.11.2024).

Ivanov V.D. 2009. Image of Juniperus // Plantarium. Plants and lichens of Russia and neighboring countries: open online galleries and plant identification guide. URL: https://www.plantarium.ru/lang/en/page/image/id/15019.html (accessed on 2 Nov 2024).

Landscapes and habitats Plants and lichens Taxa with photos

Views: 778
Discussion

Vladimir Epiktetov	1 Возможно J. rigida.
Михаил Лучкин	2 Или J. oxycedrus, что проще культивировать - на Черноморском побережье Кавказа его вдоволь! )))
Tatiana Vinokurova	3 Может, к Juniperus deltoides перенести? Он там должен быть вроде.

All photos in group

All photos of taxon

Code of link to photo

Text to cite the page

Views: 778
Discussion

All photos in group

All photos of taxon

Code of link to photo

Text to cite the page

Views: 778Discussion

Views: 778
Discussion