Соцветие. Армения, Сюник, окр. дер. Шанидзор. 05.05.2016.
See also:
Discussion (8)
Code of link to photo
| Create: | HTML or BBCode with preview or HTML or BBCode with image compressed to a given width |
| Code for linking on the web: | |
| This is how it will look: |  Orchis punctulata ssp. adenocheila on the site «Plantarium» |
Text to cite the page
Галстян Т. 2016. Изображение Orchis punctulata ssp. adenocheila (Czerniak.) Aver. // Плантариум. Растения и лишайники России и сопредельных стран: открытый онлайн атлас и определитель растений. [Электронный ресурс] URL: https://www.plantarium.ru/page/image/id/456488.html (дата обращения: 23.12.2024).
Galstyan T. 2016. Image of Orchis punctulata ssp. adenocheila (Czerniak.) Aver. // Plantarium. Plants and lichens of Russia and neighboring countries: open online galleries and plant identification guide. URL: https://www.plantarium.ru/lang/en/page/image/id/456488.html (accessed on 23 Dec 2024).
Views: 850Discussion
| Anna Malykhina | Бледненький какой, аномалию отметить надо, наверное? |
| Alexander Fateryga | А это разве не Orchis punctulata ssp. adenocheila?
 |
| Станислав Глоц | I also believe that it is Orchis adenocheila. |
| Станислав Глоц | After my inquiry, Tamar Galtsjan replied:
The Armenian institute of botany insists that Orchis adenocheila is not found in Armenia. Actually, it is not even recorded in the list of the Armenian plants. And that pale form I found among the population of Orchis purpurea subsp. caucasica.
Stanislav Gloc |
| Alexander Fateryga | Thank you, Stanislav, for this information. |
| Alexander Fateryga | In the book by Delforge (2016: p. 198), such a plant (almost identical form!) is considered to be O. adenocheila. What a problem to occur together with another species (O. purpurea subsp. caucasica)?
Pale O. purpurea subsp. caucasica should be without dark papillae on the labellum:
 |
| Dmitry Oreshkin | Из рубрики "Аномалия" нужно убрать? |
| Alexander Fateryga | Убрал. |